Back to the library
Article · Self-coaching

Did I do my best today?

A nightly question that turns experience into growth: why asking about effort beats judging outcomes, with a 3-day protocol.

Replace pressure with perspective.

At the end of the day, many of us hear that quiet voice saying: "You could have done better." What if we replaced that with:

"Did I do my best today?"

Not "did I succeed," but "did I give my best, with the circumstances I had?" This shift builds self-trust and turns pressure into learning. One question, asked at night. That's the entire practice, and it's more carefully engineered than it looks.

Why does asking about effort work better than judging results?

The question comes from Marshall Goldsmith's daily questions practice: he found that reframing evening review questions around effort, "Did I do my best to…", rather than outcomes changes what the review does to us (Goldsmith, 2015). Outcome questions invite verdicts, and verdicts invite defensiveness or despair. Effort questions invite honesty, because you're only accountable for what was actually in your hands.

There's a deeper mechanism underneath. Rotter's work on locus of control showed that people who locate the causes of events within their own actions, rather than in luck, bosses or markets, engage differently with their lives (Rotter, 1966). "Did I do my best?" is a locus-of-control workout: it points your attention at the one variable you fully own. And self-determination theory adds the motivational layer: growth sticks when it feeds autonomy and competence rather than external judgement (Ryan & Deci, 2000). An effort question does exactly that: it makes you the author of the review, not its defendant.

In our coaching sessions, we watch this reframe do quiet, structural work: the inner critic doesn't disappear, but it loses its job as the only evening narrator.

The practice, kept honest

Each evening, ask: "Did I do my best today?" Answer in two parts, a gut score, then one line about what you noticed. Some nights the honest answer is "no, and here's what got in the way." That answer is not a failure. It's the most useful data the question produces.

The phrase with the circumstances I had matters. A day of firefighting where you stayed present may be a better "best" than a smooth day on autopilot.

A three-day protocol

  • Day 1: Just answer. Tonight, ask the question and write one line. No action items, no resolutions. Notice how different it feels from "what did I get done?"
  • Day 2: Add one domain. Ask the general question, plus one specific: "Did I do my best to really listen today?" or another behaviour you care about. Specific questions catch what general ones let slide.
  • Day 3: Look for the pattern. Read your three lines. What circumstance shows up twice? That's tomorrow's design problem, not tonight's guilt.

Three evenings, three lines. Enough to feel the difference between reviewing your day and prosecuting it.

What it looks like in practice

A managing director we coached ended every day rehearsing her failures: the meeting that ran long, the email she'd sharpened too much. Competent all day, defendant all night. The question changed the courtroom into a debrief. "Did I do my best?": most nights, honestly, yes. And on the nights the answer was no, the reason was almost always the same circumstance: days with no breaks scheduled left her depleted by 3 p.m. She didn't need more discipline. She needed a calendar that stopped setting her up to fail. The evening question found what years of self-criticism hadn't.

Where the practice goes wrong

  • It turns back into a verdict. If "no" triggers a spiral, return to the anchor: effort, under real circumstances. The review is a mirror, not a judge.
  • You inflate the score. A reflexive "yes, of course" teaches nothing. The question only works at the honesty setting.
  • You skip the hard nights. The nights you least want to ask are the ones carrying the most information: the same asymmetry as in managing yourself before managing others.
  • You collect lines and never read them. The pattern across a week is where the growth is. Rhythm beats intensity here, as everywhere: see consistency over perfection.

Tonight, one line

Ask the question tonight and write one line on what you noticed about yourself. If you want a partner who remembers your answers and helps you see the pattern, pairing your evening review with the morning intention of from doing to being, practice it with Lumia, your AI coach. Stop reacting. Start seeing.

📚 Inspired by "Triggers", Marshall Goldsmith and "Atomic Habits", James Clear

Frequently asked questions

Where does the question "Did I do my best today?" come from?

It's the heart of Marshall Goldsmith's daily questions practice, described in his book Triggers. Goldsmith found that phrasing evening review questions around effort, "Did I do my best to…", rather than outcomes makes the review honest instead of punishing, because you're only accountable for what was genuinely within your control that day.

What if my honest answer is no most nights?

Then the question is working. A recurring "no" is data about circumstances, not character: look at what shows up repeatedly: no breaks, unclear priorities, meetings that drain you before the work that matters. Fix the design of the day rather than doubling the self-criticism. One honest no teaches more than a week of reflexive yeses.

How is this different from journaling?

It's smaller and sharper. Journaling opens the whole day for exploration; this practice asks one engineered question and takes one line. The constraint is the point: it survives busy weeks, and the fixed question makes patterns visible across days in a way free-form writing rarely does. Many people eventually do both.

References

  1. Goldsmith, M., & Reiter, M. (2015). Triggers: Creating Behavior That Lasts, Becoming the Person You Want to Be. Crown Business.
  2. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1–28. DOI: 10.1037/h0092976
  3. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68